Cisco Systems Inc (CSCO)

CSCO (NASDAQ:Computer Hardware) EQUITY
$30.27
pos +0.00
+0.00%
Today's Range: 0.00 - 0.00 | CSCO Avg Daily Volume: 22,436,700
Last Update: 01/23/17 - 4:00 PM EST
Volume: 0
YTD Performance: 0.17%
Open: $0.00
Previous Close: $30.27
52 Week Range: $22.46 - $31.95
Oustanding Shares: 5,019,758,934
Market Cap: 151,094,743,913
6-Month Chart
TheStreet Ratings Grade for CSCO
Buy Hold Sell
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D+ D D- E+ E E- F
TheStreet Ratings is the source for accurate ratings that you can rely upon to make sound, informed financial decisions. Click here to find out about our methodology.
Analysts Ratings
Historical Rec Current 1 Mo. Ago 2 Mo. Ago 3 Mo. Ago
Strong Buy 15 15 15 15
Moderate Buy 2 2 2 2
Hold 7 7 6 5
Moderate Sell 0 0 0 0
Strong Sell 1 1 1 1
Mean Rec. 1.80 1.80 1.75 1.70
Latest Dividend: 0.26
Latest Dividend Yield: 3.46%
Dividend Ex-Date: 01/04/17
Price Earnings Ratio: 14.27
Price Earnings Comparisons:
CSCO Sector Avg. S&P 500
14.27 14.40 30.70
Price Performance History (%Change):
3 Mo 1 Yr 3 Y
0.40% 29.53% 34.18%
GROWTH 12 Mo 3 Yr CAGR
Revenue 0.20 0.00 0.00
Net Income 19.60 0.10 0.02
EPS 20.60 0.10 0.04
Earnings for CSCO:
EBITDA 15.08B
Revenue 49.25B
Average Earnings Estimates
Qtr (01/17) Qtr (04/17) FY (07/17) FY (07/18)
Average Estimate $0.50 $0.53 $2.16 $2.27
Number of Analysts 8 8 9 9
High Estimate $0.51 $0.55 $2.21 $2.38
Low Estimate $0.49 $0.51 $2.12 $2.15
Prior Year $0.53 $0.50 $2.14 $2.16
Growth Rate (Year over Year) -5.19% 6.25% 1.09% 4.73%
Chart Benchmark
Average Frequency Timeframe
Indicator Chart Scale  
Symbol Comparison Bollinger Bands
RMPIA
By

Jim Cramer

 | Jan 20, 2017 | 2:43 PM EST
The new president's agenda has been clear from the start, so don't act surprised.
By

Bruce Kamich

 | Jan 9, 2017 | 4:24 PM EST
Shares may not show leadership in lifting the DJIA to a new milestone.
RMPIA
By

Jim Cramer

 | Jan 9, 2017 | 6:37 AM EST
You have to think that if these stocks were so high once, then it's likely they will be again.
By

David Peltier

 | Dec 28, 2016 | 4:30 PM EST
The popular dividend strategy has been a lucrative investment in 2016, but what's in store for 2017?
RMPIA
By

Eric Jhonsa

 | Dec 27, 2016 | 6:20 PM EST
Wearables, the iPhone 7, virtual reality, cybersecurity spending and Twitter each confounded expert predictions this year. What should investors take...
RMPIA
By

Doug Kass

 | Dec 27, 2016 | 10:00 AM EST
Six reasons why the Nasdaq 100 ETF seems ready to pull back.
By

Tim Melvin

 | Dec 27, 2016 | 8:00 AM EST
This value-oriented, closed-end fund is trading at a steep discount.
RMPIA
By

Doug Kass

 | Dec 27, 2016 | 7:00 AM EST
Microsoft (MSFT) , which makes up about 8.6% of the index. Amazon (AMZN) , which has about a 6.4% weighting. Cisco (CSCO) , which accounts for about 2.7% on QQQ. I've previously written that I'm bearish on Cisco on an intermediate-term basis. Non-Tech QQQ Stocks Look Iffy, Too Some non-tech QQQ components could weigh down the ETF in 2017 as well. These include biotech and health care companies such as Amgen (AMGN) , Biogen (BIIB) , Celgene (CELG) , Express Scripts (ESRX) and others, which all could suffer if Trump tries to limit drug-price increases. Comcast (CMCSA) also represents a relatively large QQQ weighting (about 3%), but the cable giant could suffer from continued "cord cutting" by consumers. Tax Cuts Won't Help QQQ Stocks Trump's plan to lower the effective U.S. corporate tax rate won't materially benefit QQQ components. After all, large tech and health care firms in the Nasdaq 100 already g
By

Doug Kass

 | Dec 21, 2016 | 10:26 AM EST
There are abundant reasons to question whether the assumptions that have led to the surprising market advance are based in reality.
By

Doug Kass

 | Dec 21, 2016 | 8:11 AM EST
An Untested President Trump. Regardless of one's political affiliation, it can be argued that, as a leader, Donald Trump is untested. His ability to understand, study and execute/implement far-reaching, complex and cohesive policy remains in question, particularly against a backdrop of deep-rooted animus between the Republican and Democratic parties.  Will the President-Elect Really Come to the Rescue of the Middle Class and Fulfill His Campaign Promises? Donald Trump ran on the notion that he will represent the Average Joe. After years of "Screwflation of the Middle Class," in which most Americans' disposable incomes had flat-lined with salaries unchanged while the costs of the necessities of life increased, the Republican candidate promised that he would represent them over the next four years. As noted below, in several bullet points, I remain a skeptic.  Will Donald Trump Be More Elitist Than Hillary Clinton? Donald Trump's cabinet appointees are comprised principally of wealthy individuals who are not representative of our broader society. The president-elect has argued that these appointees have been successful in private life and are good representatives to affect the change he has espoused. We shall see whether they feather the beds of their contemporaries or whether their policies "trickle down" to their constituents.  Campaign Promises Recanted? The president-elect has made numerous extreme campaign promises to his supporters that he already has recanted in areas of immigration ("the wall"), a possible legal response to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton's emails, tariffs and trade and other core campaign principles.  Pay For Play -- Selling Access? Donald Trump's two sons already have gotten into "pay for play" problems, something that the president-elect and the Republican opposition was critical of regarding the Clintons. Trump should be avoiding these conflicts at all costs, but he is not. Thus far there have been other examples of selling access; the president-elect doesn't yet seem to understand the degree of scrutiny a person in his position is in. He needs an army of lawyers around him building a Chinese wall between his business and the presidency. Will this be fact and can he separate himself from his business empire in order to do good and follow the will of the people without conflict?  Fiscal Policy Limitations. The Fed's monetary largesse is no longer a factor or effective in catalyzing domestic economic growth. The baton pass from monetary stimulation to fiscal expansion is likely to be less smooth and probably will be implemented much later than the consensus expects. This applies to both the U.S. and Europe, as it is all now about politics and the ability to coordinate fiscal policy successfully. Will the president-elect get cooperation of a Republican-controlled Congress to embark upon aggressive fiscal stimulation while taking the budget deficit sky high? Is this a reasonable leap of faith by investors? There are also real issues as to timing and whether fiscal stimulation will be effective in a new administration. Fiscal policy efforts, such as the monetary expansion since 2009, may fail to trickle down to where they are needed most -- the middle class. In other words, fiscal policy may not be as effective in catalyzing growth as anticipated. As an example, the CEO of Cisco (CSCO) , which possesses a large overseas cash hoard, recently was asked what the company would do wit
We have some losers here not performing, we'll cut bait SOLD SLB FEB 87.5 CALL AT .....
Altria is trading above its 2016 high today as its winning streak stretches to a sixth str...
Shares of Home Depot appear to be ending a seven week consolidation with a fresh breakout ...
The first full week of the Trump Era starts on a cautious note in the market as all the ma...

REAL MONEY PRO'S BEST IDEAS

News Breaks

Powered by
Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.